Update on Nicholas

Nicholas has been doing phenominally well and we could not be happier. Two major events have happened – which I have probably already written about, but I will say again is that Nicholas has been doing quite well with the potty. We had one little hiccup, but I think that it was caused from him being constipated/gassy. The only time he is in diapers is for going to bed. When shopping yesterday, I handed him a package of GoodNites to put into the cart and he took it and said, “Mommy, diapers are for night time only. Babies wear diapers during the day.” I said, “That’s right, Nicholas. Do you know why big boys don’t need diapers during the day?” Nicholas said, “because big boys go potty”

I have also pushed the point on him swallowing capsules (thank you Joe – you lit the fire to get me going on this). I started slow and small. Tiny gelcaps actually. We started with the Wild Oil of Oregano gelcaps (Physician’s Formula) – and I let him get used to doing one of these every week. From there, we progressed to the 00 sized caps and now he’s even swallowed the big ones. So, I’ve been slowly removing his stuff from his drinks and he’s swallowing the capsules/gelcaps. I started with the yuckiest stuff first, so it’s been a slow progression – but he’s now swallowing quite a bit of his supplements as capsules.

Nicholas’s language has been progressing past getting his needs met. Now, he’s telling us stories and his sentence structure has been quite a bit longer. The other night, he blocked off the doorway to his room and told us it was Jupiter and that no mommies or daddies were allowed. Another night, he came downstairs (I was at the computer) and he told me I was in time-out because I was not playing with him. Yesterday, he put grandpa in time out and told him to go to his room for his time out. (He hasn’t actually been in time out in quite some time, so I find this pretty funny.)

Friday, he asked me if we could go to the store so he could get a Little Einstein’s Outer Space DVD. I checked Barnes & Noble’s inventory to see if they had it, which they did, so we took a ride there. (I mean, how could I not – I am so thrilled with how he asked for it and that it just wasn’t for a trip to the toy store for a geotrax toy.) So we went to B&N and he walked up to the counter and asked the sales person for his Little Einsteins Outer Space DVD. Since it was his first time in a bookstore, I asked him if he wanted to go look at the books. He enthusiastically answered YES!!! So, we took a walk over to the kid’s book section and he was in awe. “Mommy, are all of these books for me?” to which I answered, “No, Nicholas, this is a store, but you can pick one book to buy and we’ll go pay for it.” So he looked and walked around and looked. He found a Backyardigans book (yuk) about Robots and Police and he wanted that one. I also saw a couple of other outerspace books, so I decided to pick those up for him as well. On our way up to the registers, there was a row of those big comfy chairs and there were a bunch of men sitting down reading. Nicholas climbs up onto a chair, opens his book and starts telling me a story to match the pictures as if he was reading the book. He went through each page and at the end he said “the end” We then went up to the register and Nicholas said, “I would like to pay for my book. It’s mine.”

Nicholas’s interests in reading books has taken off. He wants to read story after story. After story. I am so happy that his book collection is finally getting some use. At bedtime, he no longer watches TV before going to bed. We no longer have to “settle him down” enough to put him to bed. I can just turn the lights off and say come on Nicholas, story time. And we go get changed for bed and read him a story or two, then say goodnight and that’s it.

He’s listening so much more – seems to be understanding more of what we are saying. This is evident in some of the things he has said to us like the reference to babies wearing diapers and big boys wearing underpants. He also told me that babies play with rattles. I had told him that if he wanted to be a baby and continue wearing diapers that he had to go back to playing with baby toys. When he said baby toy trains – I said no, babies play with rattles, etc.

I’ve been able to break his outside water obsession. (THANK GOD!!!!!! This one is huge.) Anytime we would be going outside to play or even going out or coming home, Nicholas would go right to the hose at the front of the house. He would perseverate on playing with the water in one way or another. The latest would be that he used paver-like stones on top of our side-stairs to make walls on both sides and send the water down the stairs kind of in an aquaduct way. Water would be running the whole time and he could spend hours doing this. I had enough of it one day watching all of the neighborhood kids play together while mine was stuck here playing with water. So, I started taking him outside to play, but he had 2 choices of what to play/do and it never included his water-play. It took a while for him to finally pick something instead of having to be manipulated into doing something else. And by manipulated, I mean having him pick between an activity and time-out. I probably don’t have to mention that he never picked time out. In the backyard, he would also do this with playing around our pool. I worked on this simultaneously and he no longer perseverates with the water while hanging over the side of the pool, playing by the filter or playing by the ladder.

He’s using words that we have no idea where they’re coming from. I assume school, but it’s still amazing to hear so many new words I have never heard before.

He’s been so much better in the pool this year (and we’ve only been in it 3 times so far) — last year we could not get him off of the ladder – he just liked to hang out there and perseverate on his toys/water.

He’s ridiing his tricycle quite well and actually enjoys pedaling really fast and then taking his feet off the pedals so he can coast.

He’s driving his power wheeled car and is now easily turning the wheel and steering after being shown for a little while yesterday. He was able to do this before, but it’s been a long time since the car has been out – and he seemed to have not realized he could steer and was crashing into everything in sight. After spending some time with him on how to drive, he was flying around the backyard by himself.

He’s telling us “I can’t do it” when he feels he can’t do something. So then we are breaking the task down or working with him to do it – and then he says, “Yay! I can do it!”

He’s loving his trampoline and jumps, rolls, falls and runs – all with great excitement.

Last night, he asked to go to the park, so we took him to the new park at school that was just recently finished. He had a ball there and then asked to go to the other park (on the other side of the school). Then, as if this was not enough – he said he wanted to go to 3 parks and proceeded to go to the car. Luckily, there was another park not far away, so we went to that park too. (yeah, I know – lucky kid). At the 3rd park, there were older kids there playing pretty roudy running, jumping, etc. and Nicholas noticed one girl was counting and everyone was hiding — he wanted to play hide and seek with them. He followed the girl who was counting and proceeded to say, “Hi, how are you?” Outside at parks – Nicholas’s socialization is amazing. He continually seeks out other kids and tries to hard to communicate and play.

He wants to play games with us all the time — and he asks (we don’t even have to initiate). He loves to play hide and seek — and he doesn’t get distracted and leave us hiding only to do something else. He will search for us for a long time without giving up.

He’s still amazing us on the computer, how he uses the mouse and keyboard — and the games he plays just have us sitting here in awe. When he gets to parts that he has trouble with, I have shown him how to get past that — once I started doing that, and would hear him on that game — he wouldn’t need to ask for help anymore.

I showed him how to turn on the computer, open Internet Explorer and then what favorite to click on to get him to his games. Big mistake. HUGE. No seriously – this is awesome.

He transitioned to the Kindergarten class for summer session without incident. He loved preschool and had been in the same class for the past 2 years. Same teachers, same aides, etc. I thought the first day of summer school was going to be disastrous for him. He went into his new classroom and got accustomed to the new schedule without incident. (I had visions of temper tantrums in my head.) He came off the school bus that day SOOO happy. He was so excited – and every day since – we have had no issue getting him up for school (even with the shift from 12pm to 8:30am) with exception for one day that we were all up exceptionally late. He always loved school, but it seems like he is just enjoying himself so much more. We no longer have to walk him out to the bus – he runs out the front door saying goodbye and then waves from the bus. When he gets home, he gets off and comes right to the door (no b-line for the water hose).

The last report from one of his teachers said that he has been doing great attending to story time (no surpise there, he loves stories now) and was engaged the whole time. After the story, he stood up and started talking about things that happened in the story (and he’s been doing this at home too – not in a echocolic kind of way – he’s actually telling us about the story). He is more engaged during circle time activities. He has been fine doing various things everyday upon arrival to the classroom. He’s actually arguing with a classmate over a turtle in a fishing game (awesome!). He’s learned his classmates names – when I asked him who his classmates were, he actually rattled off all of their names – I couldn’t believe it.

I’ve caught him answering Dora & Diego and patting along with the Little Einsteins — I so love to see him participating. He will now come find me and summarize the show he just watched and tell me what happened.

I can ask him to go get things (that he has to look for) that are in another room and he does not stray from the task, forget, etc. I can tell him to go get a shirt and change because his shirt is all wet – and he does.

I took him to the store the other night and didn’t have to put him into a cart – he walked with me, shopped (yeah, he wanted everything that caught his eye), and listened when I said “please put that back” or “come here” or “stay with Mommy” (ALL HUGE for him!!)

When I was leaving to get groceries for the 4th yesterday, he heard me say I was leaving for the grocery store and wanted to come. Oh boy was I apprehensive. A crowded grocery store on a holiday weekend where you know the lines are going to be LONG. He did awesome. He sat in the back of the cart (because I’m told that is where the big boys sit), I handed him stuff and told me what it was and then put it into the cart. He asked for potato chips and I said not today – and there was no fight or tantrum. He asked for soda (which I had hiding under the cart) and I again said not right now — he just said okay and went on talking about the food I was handing him. When I handed him a package of chop meat, he asked if that was what I made hamburgers and meatballs from. Where he got that, I will never know. (he doesn’t really eat either). When I said I wanted to get fruit, he started saying what kind mommy? bananas, strawberries, apples… and he listed a TON of fruit. Then I said (just to test him) no, maybe I need vegetables and then I heard carrots, broccoli, peas, etc. Then he asked if we could get ice cream to which I happily obliged. I handed him a container of vanilla. He said, “mommy, you get chocolate – that’s for you. Vanilla is for me.” I handed him a package of quesadillas and he asked me where the cheese was.

Last night, he told his grandfather that he could only have chocolate because the vanilla ice cream was for him. When asked if he would share his vanilla, he happily obliged.

A few days ago, he comes home and says, “mommy, can we go to taco bell, I want a quesadilla.” So, since I did not have any in the house, I said okay. While driving, I passed Taco Bell by mistake. Without me saying a word – he says, “Mommy, you passed it – turn around please.” I was stunned.

He told on mommy and daddy to grandma. He’s sitting with her and tells her “Mommy & Daddy took my trains away.” Grandma already knew, so she prodded a bit to see if he would tell her why. He told her why – and this is huge because I did not think at first he understood why we took them away. And when he kept begging for them back, I would tell him what he needed to do to get them back and I wasn’t completely sure he totally understood what I meant.

He just seems better on a global basis. We can actually talk “to” him and feel he is listening/understanding instead of feeling we are talking at him. Another rung on the ladder to recovery….

Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

Thursday, June 25, 2009 by: Barbara Minton, Natural Health Editor

(NaturalNews) As the anticipated July release date for Baxter’s A/H1N1 flu pandemic vaccine approaches, an Austrian investigative journalist is warning the world that the greatest crime in the history of humanity is underway. Jane Burgermeister has recently filed criminal charges with the FBI against the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations (UN), and several of the highest ranking government and corporate officials concerning bioterrorism and attempts to commit mass murder. She has also prepared an injunction against forced vaccination which is being filed in America. These actions follow her charges filed in April against Baxter AG and Avir Green Hills Biotechnology of Austria for producing contaminated bird flu vaccine, alleging this was a deliberate act to cause and profit from a pandemic.

Summary of claims and allegations filed with FBI in Austria on June 10, 2009

In her charges, Burgermeister presents evidence of acts of bioterrorism that is in violation of U.S. law by a group operating within the U.S. under the direction of international bankers who control the Federal Reserve, as well as WHO, UN and NATO. This bioterrorism is for the purpose of carrying out a mass genocide against the U.S. population by use of a genetically engineered flu pandemic virus with the intent of causing death. This group has annexed high government offices in the U.S.

Specifically, evidence is presented that the defendants, Barack Obama, President of the U.S, David Nabarro, UN System Coordinator for Influenza, Margaret Chan, Director-General of WHO, Kathleen Sibelius, Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services, Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, David de Rotschild, banker, David Rockefeller, banker, George Soros, banker, Werner Faymann, Chancellor of Austria, and Alois Stoger, Austrian Health Minister, among others, are part of this international corporate criminal syndicate which has developed, produced, stockpiled and employed biological weapons to eliminate the population of the U.S. and other countries for financial and political gain.

The charges contend that these defendants conspired with each other and others to devise, fund and participate in the final phase of the implementation of a covert international bioweapons program involving the pharmaceutical companies Baxter and Novartis. They did this by bioengineering and then releasing lethal biological agents, specifically the “bird flu” virus and the “swine flu virus” in order to have a pretext to implement a forced mass vaccination program which would be the means of administering a toxic biological agent to cause death and injury to the people of the U.S. This action is in direct violation of the Biological Weapons Anti-terrorism Act.

Burgermeister’s charges include evidence that Baxter AG, Austrian subsidiary of Baxter International, deliberately sent out 72 kilos of live bird flu virus, supplied by the WHO in the winter of 2009 to 16 laboratories in four counties. She claims this evidence offers clear proof that the pharmaceutical companies and international government agencies themselves are actively engaged in producing, developing, manufacturing and distributing biological agents classified as the most deadly bioweapons on earth in order to trigger a pandemic and cause mass death.

In her April charges, she noted that Baxter’s lab in Austria, one of the supposedly most secure biosecurity labs in the world, did not adhere to the most basic and essential steps to keep 72 kilos of a pathogen classified as a bioweapon secure and separate from all other substances under stringent biosecurity level regulations, but it allowed it to be mixed with the ordinary human flu virus and sent from its facilities in Orth in the Donau.

In February, when a staff member at BioTest in the Czech Republic tested the material meant for candidate vaccines on ferrets, the ferrets died. This incident was not followed up by any investigation from the WHO, EU, or Austrian health authorities. There was no investigation of the content of the virus material, and there is no data on the genetic sequence of the virus released.

In answer to parliamentary questions on May 20th, the Austrian Health Minister, Alois Stoger, revealed that the incident had been handled not as a biosecurity lapse, as it should have been, but as an offence against the veterinary code. A veterinary doctor was sent to the lab for a brief inspection.

Burgermeister’s dossier reveals that the release of the virus was to be an essential step for triggering a pandemic that would allow the WHO to declare a Level 6 Pandemic. She lists the laws and decrees that would allow the UN and WHO to take over the United States in the event of pandemic. In addition, legislation requiring compliance with mandatory vaccinations would be put into force in the U.S. under conditions of pandemic declaration.

She charges that the entire “swine flu” pandemic business is premised on a massive lie that there is no natural virus out there that poses a threat to the population. She presents evidence leading to the belief that the bird flu and swine flu viruses have, in fact, been bioengineered in laboratories using funding supplied by the WHO and other government agencies, among others. This “swine flu” is a hybrid of part swine flu, part human flu and part bird flu, something that can only come from laboratories according to many experts.

WHO’s claim that this “swine flu” is spreading and a pandemic must be declared ignores the fundamental causes. The viruses that were released were created and released with the help of WHO, and WHO is overwhelmingly responsible for the pandemic in the first place. In addition, the symptoms of the supposed “swine flu” are indistinguishable from regular flu or from the common cold. The “swine flu” does not cause death anymore often than the regular flu causes death.

Burgermeister notes that the figures for deaths reported for the “swine flu” are inconsistent and there is no clarity as to how the number of “deaths” has been documented.

There is no pandemic potential unless mass vaccinations are carried out to weaponize the flu under the guise of protecting the population. There are reasonable grounds for believing that the mandatory vaccines will be purposely contaminated with diseases that are specifically designed to cause death.

Reference is made to a licensed Novartis bird flu vaccine that killed 21 homeless people in Poland in the summer of 2008 and had as its “primary outcome measure” an “adverse events rate”, thereby meeting the U.S. government’s own definition of a bioweapon (a biological agent designed to cause an adverse events rate, i.e death or injury) with a delivery system (injection).

She alleges that the same complex of international pharmaceutical companies and international government agencies that have developed and released pandemic material have positioned themselves to profit from triggering the pandemic with contracts to supply vaccines. Media controlled by the group that is engineering the “swine flu” agenda is spreading misinformation to lull the people of the U.S. into taking the dangerous vaccine.

The people of the U.S. will suffer substantial and irreparable harm and injury if they are forced to take this unproven vaccine without their consent in accordance with the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act, National Emergency Act, National Security Presidential Directive/NSPD 51, Homeland Security Presidential Directive/HSPD-20, and the International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza.

In the U.S. since 2008, Burgermeister charges that those named in her allegations have implemented new and/or accelerated the implementation of laws and regulations designed to strip the citizens of the U.S. of their lawful constitutional rights to refuse an injection. These people have created or allowed provisions to remain in place that make it a criminal act to refuse to take an injection against pandemic viruses. They have imposed other excessive and cruel penalties such as imprisonment and/or quarantine in FEMA camps while barring the citizens of the U.S. from claiming compensation from injury or death from the forced injections. This is in violation of the laws governing federal corruption and the abuse of office as well as of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Through these actions, the named defendants have laid the groundwork for mass genocide.

Using the “swine flu” as a pretext, the defendants have preplanned the mass murder of the U.S. population by means of forced vaccination. They have installed an extensive network of FEMA concentration camps and identified mass grave sites, and they have been involved in devising and implementing a scheme to hand power over the U.S. to an international crime syndicate that uses the UN and WHO as a front for illegal racketeering influenced organized crime activities, in violation of the laws that govern treason.

She further charges that the complex of pharmaceutical companies consisting of Baxter, Novartis and Sanofi Aventis are part of a foreign-based dual purpose bioweapons program, financed by this international criminal syndicate and designed to implement mass murder to reduce the world’s population by more than 5 billion people in the next ten years. Their plan is to spread terror to justify forcing people to give up their rights, and to force mass quarantine in FEMA camps. The houses, companies and farms and lands of those who are killed will be up for grabs by this syndicate.

By eliminating the population of North America, the international elite gain access to the region’s natural resources such as water and undeveloped oil lands. And by eliminating the U.S. and its democratic constitution by subsuming it under a North American Union, the international crime group will have total control over North America.

Highlights from the complete dossier

The complete dossier of the June 10th action is a 69 page document presenting evidence to substantiate all charges. This includes:

Factual background that delineates time lines and facts that establish probable cause, UN and WHO definitions and roles, and history and incidents from the April, 2009 “swine flu” outbreak.

Evidence the “swine flu” vaccines are defined as bioweapons as delineates in government agencies and regulations classifying and restricting vaccines, and the fear of foreign countries that “swine flu” vaccines will be used for biological warfare.

Scientific evidence the “swine flu” virus is an artificial (genetic) virus.

Scientific evidence the “swine flu” was bioengineered to resemble the Spanish flu virus of 1918 including quotes from Swine Flu 2009 is Weaponized 1918 Spanish Flu by A. True Ott, Ph.D., N.D., and a Science Magazine report from Dr. Jeffrey Taubenberger et.al.

The genome sequence of the “swine flu”

Evidence of the deliberate release of the “swine flu” in Mexico

Evidence as to the involvement of President Obama that delineates his trip to Mexico which coincided with the recent “swine flu” outbreak and the death of several officials involved in his trip. Contention is made that the President was never tested for “swine flu” because he had been previously vaccinated.

Evidence as to the role of Baxter and WHO in producing and releasing pandemic virus material in Austria includes a statement from a Baxter official stating the accidentally distributed H5N1 in the Czech Republic was received from a WHO reference center. This includes delineation of evidence and allegations from Burgermeister’s charges filed in April in Austria that are currently under investigation.

Evidence Baxter is an element in a covert bioweapons network

Evidence Baxter has deliberately contaminated vaccine material.

Evidence Novartis is using vaccines as bioweapons

Evidence as to WHO’s role in the bioweapons program

Evidence as to WHO’s manipulation of disease data in order to justify declaring a Pandemic Level 6 in order to seize control of the USA.

Evidence as to the FDA’s role in covering up the bioweapons program

Evidence as to Canada’s National Microbiology Lab’s role in the bioweapons program.

Evidence of the involvement of scientists working for the UK’s NIBSC, and the CDC in engineering the “swine flu”.

Evidence vaccinations caused the Spanish killer flu of 1918 including belief of Dr. Jerry Tennant that the widespread use of aspirin during the winter that followed the end of World War I could have been a key factor contributing to the earlier pandemic by suppressing the immune system and lowering body temperatures, allowing the flu virus to multiply. Tamiflu and Relenza also lower body temperatures, and therefore can also be expected to contribute to the spread of a pandemic.

Evidence as to manipulation of the legal framework to allow mass murder with impunity.

Constitutional issues: the legality vs. illegality of jeopardizing the life, health and public good by mass vaccinations.

The issue of immunity and compensation as evidence of intent to commit a crime.

Evidence as to the existence of an international corporate crime syndicate.

Evidence of the existence of the “Illuminati”.

Evidence as to the depopulation agenda of the Illuminati/Bilderbergs and their involvement in the engineering and release of the artificial “swine flu” virus.

Evidence that weaponized flu was discussed at the annual Bilderberg meeting in Athens from May 14-17, 2009, as part of their agenda of genocide, including a list of attendees who, according to a statement once made by Pierre Trudeau, view themselves as genetically superior to the rest of humanity.

Media is keeping Americans clueless about the threat they are under

Jane Burgermeister is a dual Irish/Austrian who has written for Nature, the British Medical Journal, and American Prospect. She is the European Correspondent of the Renewable Energy World website. She has written extensively about climate change, biotechnology, and the ecology.

In addition to the charges currently under investigation that she filed against Baxter AG and Avir Green Hills Biotechnology in April, she has filed charges against WHO and Baxter among others concerning a case of exploding “swine flu” vials meant for a research lab on a busy IC train in Switzerland.

In her view, control of the media by the ruling elite has allowed the world crime syndicate to further its agenda unabated while the rest of the people remain in the dark about what is really going on. Her charges are an attempt to get around this media control and bring the truth to light.

Her greatest concern is that “in spite of the fact Baxter has been caught red handed nearly triggering pandemic, they are also moving ahead, together with allied pharma companies, with supplying the vaccine for pandemics.” Baxter is hurrying to get this vaccine to market some time in July.

For more information:
http://www.naturalnews.com/025760.html
http://birdflu666.wordpress.com/200…
http://in.news.yahoo.com/137/200906…
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/…

Thank you, NaturalNews.com for getting this information out to the masses!

Cervical cancer vaccine for babies

As if there aren’t enough adverse reports and deaths from the Gardasil and Cervarix vaccines, now Australia wants to administer this vaccine to babies. BABIES???????????

Cervical Cancer vaccine for babies

SYDNEY: A doctor at the Royal Women’s Hospital in Melbourne has proposed to test a cervical cancer vaccine in babies, with a view to adding the vaccine to the infant immunisation program.

The vaccine is currently being given to schoolgirls as part of the trials in which Suzanne Garland, the director of microbiology and infectious diseases at the hospital, has herself played a leading role.

She is now making a US visit to meet representatives from the drug companies that make the vaccine. She will discuss with them the proposal to conduct trials in babies up to a few months old.

Professor Garland conducted company-funded trials for CSL’s vaccine Gardasil and the rival GSK’s vaccine Cervarix, the two companies that have her on their advisory boards. She is of the opinion that there are benefits to immunising babies instead of schoolgirls.

According to her, vaccination of babies can particularly be beneficial for the Third World countries, where many girls do not finish school. It could also be easier to vaccinate Australian infants instead of schoolgirls, she says.

Since the vaccine has so far been tested only in children as young as 10, there is need to first test its effectiveness and safety in infants, Professor Garland concedes.

She feels that it is possible to combine cervical cancer vaccine with another so that babies were spared from too many jabs. However, it is yet unclear as to for how long the vaccine’s effect will last, and whether babies will require booster shots years later.

Frank Bowden, a sexual health physician at the Canberra Hospital, said that the priority for infant immunisation should be to prevent childhood diseases.

He, however, admitted that the vaccine could become a part of the childhood schedule one day.

“By the time that happens you would want to have more experience with that vaccine,” Sydney Morning Herald quoted him as saying.

Autism Vaccine Complaint Movie: “Selective Hearing, Brian Deer and the GMC”

Click to view: Autism Vaccine Complaint Movie: “Selective Hearing, Brian Deer and the GMC”

Obama’s Plan to Change U.S. Health Care System Will Cost Nearly Two TRILLION Dollars

Obama’s Plan to Change U.S. Health Care System Will Cost Nearly Two TRILLION Dollars

Link to article on Mercola.com

Sanofi Pasteur lists Autism as a adverse event on it’s dtap Tripedia Vaccine

http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm101580.pdf

Adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, autism, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathy, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence and apnea. Events were included in this list because of the seriousness or frequency of reporting. Because these events are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequencies or to establish a causal relationship to components of Tripedia vaccine.2

Just in case they remove the product insert (or remove the autism mention) – download it here

FDA may put restrictions on Tylenol

Well, it’s about time. Hey FDA, can you look at cipro next?

“We believe there is a clear health benefit of over-the-counter combination products containing acetaminophen,”

Yeah, sure you do. But wait, don’t you mean the benefit is a financial one??

“Manufacturers could lose hundreds of millions of dollars in sales if combination drugs are pulled from the market. Total sales of all acetaminophen drugs reached $2.6 billion last year, with 80 percent of the market comprised of over-the-counter products.”

There it is folks, they could lose hundeds of millions of dollars in sales. Hmmm…. now what does this sound like?????

FDA may put restrictions on Tylenol
MATTHEW PERRONE
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

ADELPHI, Md. – The makers of Tylenol, Excedrin and other medications are trying to dissuade regulators from placing new restrictions on their popular painkillers, including possibly removing some of them from store shelves.

The Food and Drug Administration has assembled more than 35 experts to discuss ways to prevent overdose with acetaminophen – the pain-relieving, fever-reducing ingredient in Tylenol and dozens of other prescription and over-the-counter medications.

Despite years of educational campaigns and other federal actions, acetaminophen is the leading cause of liver failure in the U.S., sending 56,000 people to the emergency room annually, according to the FDA.

The agency today asked its experts to consider a range of options: adding a “black box” warning label to the products, lowering the drug dosage in some products, or pulling certain types of medications off the market.

The drugs that could be pulled off shelves are combination medications, such as Procter & Gamble’s NyQuil or Novartis’ Theraflu, which combine acetaminophen with other ingredients that treat cough and runny nose.

The FDA says patients often pair them with a pure acetaminophen medication, like Tylenol, exposing themselves to unsafe levels of the drug.

But the industry group that represents Johnson & Johnson, Wyeth and other companies defended the products today, saying they pose a relatively small risk to patients.

Only 10 percent of deaths linked to acetaminophen medications involved over-the-counter combination cold medications, according to the Consumer Healthcare Products Association.

The majority of deaths were caused by either single-ingredient drugs or prescription strength combination drugs like Percocet, which combines oxycodone and acetaminophen.

“We believe there is a clear health benefit of over-the-counter combination products containing acetaminophen,” said Linda Suydam, the group’s president.

The FDA is not required to follow the advice of its panels, though it usually does. The panel vote is scheduled for Tuesday afternoon.

Manufacturers could lose hundreds of millions of dollars in sales if combination drugs are pulled from the market. Total sales of all acetaminophen drugs reached $2.6 billion last year, with 80 percent of the market comprised of over-the-counter products.

Tylenol-maker Johnson & Johnson also pushed back against a proposal to lower the maximum daily dose of acetaminophen, which is currently 4 grams daily, or eight pills of a medication like Extra Strength Tylenol.

While taking more than 4 grams per day can cause liver injury, J&J argued that taking the exact dose is proven to treat osteoarthritis pain.

J&J also warned panelists that any new restrictions on acetaminophen would force patients to switch to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which carry risks of gastrointestinal bleeding and sometimes fatal kidney injury.

“When switching occurs, the risk of death increases,” said Dr. Kenneth Rothman, a consultant for J&J. According to figures from Rothman, a 30 percent switch away from acetaminophen would result in an additional 5,000 deaths per year.

Top-sellers in the anti-inflammatory drug market include Bayer AG’s aspirin and Wyeth’s Advil.

Executives from Wyeth scheduled a series of media briefings last week, arguing there’s no evidence that the reduced use of acetaminophen would cause more negative side effects with their drug.

“There are major flaws in their arguments that are not born out in real world experience,” said Dr. Paul Desjardins, a vice president with Wyeth.

Desjardins pointed out that the U.K. has put tighter safety measures in place for acetaminophen without causing increased problems with Advil and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

For its part, the FDA has made clear it will not play king-maker in the market for over-the-counter medications. The agency says its only goal is to reduce liver injury, “not to decrease appropriate acetaminophen use or to drive people to use NSAIDS instead.”

Solutions for Forced Vaccinations and Flu Pandemics

Solutions for Forced Vaccinations and Flu Pandemics

Thursday, July 02, 2009 by: Paul Fassa, citizen journalist

(NaturalNews) In response to several readers concern over the issues presented by the article Watch Out for Flying Syringes, GMO Food Vaccines, and Forced Vaccinations, here are some solutions. Most of the solutions suggested are for vaccination induced disease syndrome (VIDS) or post vaccination syndrome (PVS). Some are for the flu itself.

Especially among the very young whose immune systems are not fully developed, there have been many almost immediate, terrible consequences of VIDS or PVS. Understand that though you may have had vaccinations and walked away on your own two feet, there are residual, latent dangers that can cause auto immune problems later in life. There are several thousand Gulf War I veterans who can attest to that!

Vaccination by inoculation is not immunization. Immunization occurs when you are stricken with a disease and survive, or if you`re exposed to pathogens and your immune system beats them. Even without the hazardous materials usually present in vaccines, bypassing the normal path of the immune system by injection into the bloodstream with pathogens from unusual sources causes more long term chronic stress on the immune system. This chronic immune system stress manifests in illness or disease later in life.

This Article`s Format

There will be a brief descriptive summary of vaccination legal or medical assistance preceded by a number in bold that corresponds to the source in the sources section below. If you wish to pursue any topics further, those numbered source links can help you. If a link doesn`t work for you, then simply try copying the URL and pasting it into the blank browser address window and pressing the go button. There is an abundance of remedies to be explored beyond the scope of one article.

Many of the antidotes to VIDS or PVS are homeopathic. They usually require a personal approach to determine the exact homeopathic agents, their strengths, and protocol. So details are important. Homeopathy is effective and safe. It was around before the allopathic AMA started shoving it out of public view in America. During the 1918 so called Spanish Flu pandemic, most of those who survived used homeopathy or nothing at all. Many of those who were vaccinated died!

Over the last two decades, homeopathy has been applied successfully to VIDS or PVS victims of all ages. If there is no homeopath or other holistic practitioner available in your area who specializes in handling VIDS or PVS, then it`s recommended that you take some of the information from whatever source you investigate to your local holistic practitioner or contact someone in that source directly.

(1) Homeopathy for Everyone offers a comprehensive overview of homeopathy. From there you may find a list of homeopaths, perhaps one close to you. Only the homeopaths who signed up to this directory are listed, however. But the information you get from any of the sources below can be taken to a holistic practitioner in your area

What About a Pandemic Flu Episode?

(2) First, understand that flu victims who die usually do as a result of complications from the flu, especially pneumonia or other lung inflammation. During the last swine flu hysteria (2009) that occurred in Mexico City, a few homeopathic doctors banded together and came up with a protocol for curing that specific episode with a very high success rate. Their report was translated into English and posted.

(3) Then there are inexpensive black elderberry tinctures, which have been tested successfully on several different flu virus types. The swine flu was not available for those tests. Those can be ordered on line or made in large quantities at home. If you make your own tincture, don`t forget to let it season for at least a month avoiding sunlight, and shaking the mixture daily while seasoning. There is more information on that in the Natural News article Elderberry Trumps Tamiflu for Flu Remedy.

Avoiding Forced Vaccinations

(4) More and more states in the USA are forcing vaccinations through the school system or workplaces. Attorney Alan Phillips, author of Dispelling Vaccination Myths, specializes in VIDS or PVS cases nationwide. He got interested in the subject when he noticed the warning on a vaccination that was about to be administered to his infant child. The warning clearly stated that the odds of death from the vaccination were considerably higher than death from the diseases it was supposed to immunize. He challenged the perplexed doctor, refused the vaccination, and after more investigation dedicated his legal practice to claiming monetary damages for VIDS victims.

(5) The Vaccination Liberation Movement has lots of free detailed information on state vaccination exemptions and sample letters. These are effective for locally enforced vaccinations required by school systems, or workplaces and even the military. There is no guarantee that all the information is up to date. But if not, this could be a starting point to check on current local state laws.

(5A) Natural News writer Barbara Minton’s informative, recent feature article, Sign the Universal Declaration of Resistance to Mandatory Vaccination is where you can sign a petition to halt forced vaccinations. It is hoped to have an impact on the right people if enough sign up and submit it. Barbara also has more information on what the nature and motives are behind what is going on with the current pandemic scares and forced vaccinations.

(6) According to Dr. Rima E. Laibow, the Nuremberg Trails condemnation of dangerous medical experimentation on humans sets an international legal precedent. Since a rush by the pharmaceutical companies precludes proper testing, and since by law the vaccine producers are now exempt from vaccine damage liability, forced vaccinations due to pandemic alerts is dangerous human medical experimentation! Dr. Laibow also has a free white form to request a legal self imposed quarantine during an epidemic and resist a forced vaccination.

So far, home schooling, private schools, and utilizing legal exemptions have enabled some parents to protect their children from vaccinations forced by the public school systems. The legal exemptions also have helped others avoid enforced vaccinations in the workplace or even the military. But the white form may be the only legal out eventually.

(7) How long the legal loopholes will remain, and what will happen after the powers that be (sinister as they are) will declare a pandemic emergency to unleash a huge forced vaccination campaign in North America and perhaps elsewhere, is unknown. Natural News article Watch Out for Flying Syringes . . . contains some evidence of those North American forced vaccination plans and even control from the U.N. health czar can occur.

Then there is also the possibility of leaving the country and settling in areas such as South or Central America (except Columbia) if possible, where forced vaccinations do not exist or would be too difficult to enforce. In case none of the above options may be available to you, it would be wise to brace yourself for the worst and investigate remedies for VIDS (vaccination induced disease syndrome) or PVS (post vaccination syndrome) to ameliorate the potential vaccination damage.

VIDS or PVS Remedies

According to Sheri Nakken, a homeopath who specializes in VIDS or PVS remedy and recovery, Vaccine Safety Manual for Concerned Families and Health Practitioners: Guide to Immunization Risks and Protection, by Neil Z. Miller and The Vaccine Guide, by Randall Neustaedter are the best available books on the subjects of vaccination injury and remedy.

(8) Fulvic Acid is inexpensive and immediately accessible on line. Besides being a safe and effective chelation agent that removes much of the heavy metals present in vaccines, it provides a body with all the minerals, trace elements, and micro-nutrients needed. It has been clinically tested successfully in China for difficult lung disorders. And the lungs are where the flu and pneumonia reside!

Considering the catastrophic possibilities, it may be well worth your time to investigate the listed sources until satisfied with enough to remedy potential vaccination damage, PVS or VIDS. Some of these sources have made themselves available to the public at large via email or phone. These sources are passionate on the subject of protecting their fellow humans from VIDS or PVS.

(9) There are actually courses available that enable one to protect themselves or their children from vaccination damage. They are not expensive, and they use the two books mentioned above. Some courses also provide a list of other sources concerned about vaccination damage.

(10) The Vaccination and Liberation movement has an impressive list of products from various sources that are available to help recover from VIDS or PVS. And there is even a source for a homeopathic nosode, which is a safe form of immunization, to safeguard against pneumonia, which is the complication that often becomes a killer from any form of flu.

(11) Dr. Tinus Smit, a Dutch MD and homeopath and author of a free booklet entitled Post Vaccination Syndrome, is living proof of the efficacy of homeopathy for PVS or VIDS. He has an almost perfect track record of curing PVS clients throughout Europe and parts of Asia. He has even cured autistic children completely from mercury infested early childhood vaccinations. His free booklet is available on line in English.

(12) Some state enforcement agencies can and will play hardball with parents who won’t allow their children to be vaccinated. Dr. Rebecca Carley had her only child taken into custody from her during her divorce proceeding in New York because she refused to have him vaccinated. She has since regained custody of her boy, and has become a court expert witness on vaccination damage in the Bronx Court System of New York City. She devotes her medical practice to VIDS or PVS.

(13) The Think Twice Global Institute is an excellent resource that includes a list of practitioners who specialize in VIDS or PVS. Some are listed with addresses and phone numbers and others have their websites linked. Many will not be in your local area, but may serve as a reference for practitioners in your locale or as a referral source for someone near you.

(14) A Homeopathy Ezine is available free off the Homeopathy for Everyone website with a direct link.

Don`t let all the bad news around us stress you. Safeguard your immune system in all the ways you know or discover. Be vigilant with equanimity. By accessing information from the sources listed below, you will have the tools to resist vaccinations or be cured from the aftermath of having been the victim of a forced vaccination campaign. You might want to bookmark these now and take time to decide which best serves your needs later. Just don`t wait too long. Things are beginning to happen.

(1) Homeopathy for Everyone http://www.hpathy.com/

(2) Observations of Mexican Flu 2009
http://www.hpathy.com/papersnew/gal…

(3) Elderberry Trumps Tamiflu http://www.naturalnews.com/026354_e

(4) Alan Phillips (attorney) http://www.vaccinerights.com/index.html

(5) Vaccination Liberation http://www.vaccinetruth.net/index.htm

(5A) Resistance to Forced Vaccination Petition
http://www.naturalnews.com/026496_N… AND
http://www.naturalnews.com/026503_p

(6) Health Freedom and white paper (Dr. Rima Laibow) http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=2752

(7) Watch Out for Flying Vaccinations, GMO Edible Vaccines, and Forced Vaccinations
http://www.naturalnews.com/026434_v

(8) Fulvic Acid http://www.naturalnews.com/026258.html OR
http://www.naturalnews.com/026475_fulvic_acid_food_health.html

(9) Sheri Nakken (course) http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm
(home page & list of other resources) http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm

(10) Vaccination and Liberation (letter from Donna Carillo) http://www.vaclib.org/chapter/donna…

(11) Dr. Tinus Smit (home) http://www.post-vaccination-syndrom…
(PVS info/ebook) http://www.post-vaccination-syndrome.com/3840/pvs.aspx

(12) Dr. Rebecca Carley http://www.drcarley.com/

(13) Think Twice Global Institute http://thinktwice.com/reversal.htm

(14) A Homeopathy Ezine http://www.hpathy.com/ezine/2008nov.asp

How Allopathic Medicine is Shooting Itself in the Foot by Attacking Oprah

Ginger wrote a great piece about the recent Newsweek article on Oprah that I wanted to share.

How Allopathic Medicine is Shooting Itself in the Foot by Attacking Oprah

Oprah, thank you for doing what you do and bringing all of these issues/treatments to everyone’s attention. Our personal health and well being depends on us getting all the information available on all known treatments/drugs/supplements to make an informed decision on medical procedures and pharmaceuticals – and it’s refreshing to hear about alternative treatments. Keep doing what you do, Oprah!!

Roundup proves DEADLY to Human Cells

Weed-Whacking Herbicide Proves Deadly to Human Cells

Roundup herbicide has toxic inert ingredient.

Weed-Whacking Herbicide Proves Deadly to Human Cells
Used in gardens, farms, and parks around the world, the weed killer Roundup contains an ingredient that can suffocate human cells in a laboratory, researchers say.
By Crystal Gammon and Environmental Health News

Used in yards, farms and parks throughout the world, Roundup has long been a top-selling weed killer. But now researchers have found that one of Roundup’s inert ingredients can kill human cells, particularly embryonic, placental and umbilical cord cells.

The new findings intensify a debate about so-called “inerts” — the solvents, preservatives, surfactants and other substances that manufacturers add to pesticides. Nearly 4,000 inert ingredients are approved for use by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Glyphosate, Roundup’s active ingredient, is the most widely used herbicide in the United States. About 100 million pounds are applied to U.S. farms and lawns every year, according to the EPA.

Until now, most health studies have focused on the safety of glyphosate, rather than the mixture of ingredients found in Roundup. But in the new study, scientists found that Roundup’s inert ingredients amplified the toxic effect on human cells—even at concentrations much more diluted than those used on farms and lawns.

One specific inert ingredient, polyethoxylated tallowamine, or POEA, was more deadly to human embryonic, placental and umbilical cord cells than the herbicide itself – a finding the researchers call “astonishing.”

“This clearly confirms that the [inert ingredients] in Roundup formulations are not inert,” wrote the study authors from France’s University of Caen. “Moreover, the proprietary mixtures available on the market could cause cell damage and even death [at the] residual levels” found on Roundup-treated crops, such as soybeans, alfalfa and corn, or lawns and gardens.

The research team suspects that Roundup might cause pregnancy problems by interfering with hormone production, possibly leading to abnormal fetal development, low birth weights or miscarriages.

Monsanto, Roundup’s manufacturer, contends that the methods used in the study don’t reflect realistic conditions and that their product, which has been sold since the 1970s, is safe when used as directed. Hundreds of studies over the past 35 years have addressed the safety of glyphosate.

“Roundup has one of the most extensive human health safety and environmental data packages of any pesticide that’s out there,” said Monsanto spokesman John Combest. “It’s used in public parks, it’s used to protect schools. There’s been a great deal of study on Roundup, and we’re very proud of its performance.”

The EPA considers glyphosate to have low toxicity when used at the recommended doses.

“Risk estimates for glyphosate were well below the level of concern,” said EPA spokesman Dale Kemery. The EPA classifies glyphosate as a Group E chemical, which means there is strong evidence that it does not cause cancer in humans.

In addition, the EPA and the U.S. Department of Agriculture both recognize POEA as an inert ingredient. Derived from animal fat, POEA is allowed in products certified organic by the USDA. The EPA has concluded that it is not dangerous to public health or the environment.

The French team, led by Gilles-Eric Seralini, a University of Caen molecular biologist, said its results highlight the need for health agencies to reconsider the safety of Roundup.

“The authorizations for using these Roundup herbicides must now clearly be revised since their toxic effects depend on, and are multiplied by, other compounds used in the mixtures,” Seralini’s team wrote.

Controversy about the safety of the weed killer recently erupted in Argentina, one of the world’s largest exporters of soy.

Last month, an environmental group petitioned Argentina’s Supreme Court, seeking a temporary ban on glyphosate use after an Argentine scientist and local activists reported a high incidence of birth defects and cancers in people living near crop-spraying areas. Scientists there also linked genetic malformations in amphibians to glysophate. In addition, last year in Sweden, a scientific team found that exposure is a risk factor for people developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Inert ingredients are often less scrutinized than active pest-killing ingredients. Since specific herbicide formulations are protected as trade secrets, manufacturers aren’t required to publicly disclose them. Although Monsanto is the largest manufacturer of glyphosate-based herbicides, several other manufacturers sell similar herbicides with different inert ingredients.

The term “inert ingredient” is often misleading, according to Caroline Cox, research director of the Center for Environmental Health, an Oakland-based environmental organization. Federal law classifies all pesticide ingredients that don’t harm pests as “inert,” she said. Inert compounds, therefore, aren’t necessarily biologically or toxicologically harmless – they simply don’t kill insects or weeds.

Kemery said the EPA takes into account the inert ingredients and how the product is used, whenever a pesticide is approved for use. The aim, he said, is to ensure that “if the product is used according to labeled directions, both people’s health and the environment will not be harmed.” One label requirement for Roundup is that it should not be used in or near freshwater to protect amphibians and other wildlife.

But some inert ingredients have been found to potentially affect human health. Many amplify the effects of active ingredients by helping them penetrate clothing, protective equipment and cell membranes, or by increasing their toxicity. For example, a Croatian team recently found that an herbicide formulation containing atrazine caused DNA damage, which can lead to cancer, while atrazine alone did not.

POEA was recognized as a common inert ingredient in herbicides in the 1980s, when researchers linked it to a group of poisonings in Japan. Doctors there examined patients who drank Roundup, either intentionally or accidentally, and determined that their sicknesses and deaths were due to POEA, not glyphosate.

POEA is a surfactant, or detergent, derived from animal fat. It is added to Roundup and other herbicides to help them penetrate plants’ surfaces, making the weed killer more effective.

“POEA helps glyphosate interact with the surfaces of plant cells,” explained Negin Martin, a scientist at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences in North Carolina, who was not involved in the study. POEA lowers water’s surface tension–the property that makes water form droplets on most surfaces–which helps glyphosate disperse and penetrate the waxy surface of a plant.

In the French study, researchers tested four different Roundup formulations, all containing POEA and glyphosate at concentrations below the recommended lawn and agricultural dose. They also tested POEA and glyphosate separately to determine which caused more damage to embryonic, placental and umbilical cord cells.

Glyphosate, POEA and all four Roundup formulations damaged all three cell types. Umbilical cord cells were especially sensitive to POEA. Glyphosate became more harmful when combined with POEA, and POEA alone was more deadly to cells than glyphosate. The research appears in the January issue of the journal Chemical Research in Toxicology.

By using embryonic and placental cell lines, which multiply and respond to chemicals rapidly, and fresh umbilical cord cells, Seralini’s team was able to determine how the chemicals combine to damage cells.

The two ingredients work together to “limit breathing of the cells, stress them and drive them towards a suicide,” Seralini said.

The research was funded in part by France’s Committee for Research and Independent Information on Genetic Engineering, a scientific committee that investigates risks associated with genetically modified organisms. One of Roundup’s primary uses is on crops that are genetically engineered to be resistant to glyphosate.

Monsanto scientists argue that cells in Seralini’s study were exposed to unnaturally high levels of the chemicals. “It’s very unlike anything you’d see in real-world exposure. People’s cells are not bathed in these things,” said Donna Farmer, another toxicologist at Monsanto.

Seralini’s team, however, did study multiple concentrations of Roundup. These ranged from the typical agricultural or lawn dose down to concentrations 100,000 times more dilute than the products sold on shelves. The researchers saw cell damage at all concentrations.

Monsanto scientists also question the French team’s use of laboratory cell lines.
“These are just not very good models of a whole organism, like a human being,” said Dan Goldstein, a toxicologist with Monsanto.

Goldstein said humans have protective mechanisms that resist substances in the environment, such as skin and the lining of the gastrointestinal tract, which constantly renew themselves. “Those phenomena just don’t happen with isolated cells in a Petri dish.”

But Cox, who studies pesticides and their inert ingredients at the Oakland environmental group, says lab experiments like these are important in determining whether a chemical is safe.

“We would never consider it ethical to test these products on people, so we’re obliged to look at their effects on other species and in other systems,” she said. “There’s really no way around that.”

Seralini said the cells used in the study are widely accepted in toxicology as good models for studying the toxicity of chemicals.

“The fact is that 90 percent of labs studying mechanisms of toxicity or physiology use cell lines,” he said.

Most research has examined glyphosate alone, rather than combined with Roundup’s inert ingredients. Researchers who have studied Roundup formulations have drawn conclusions similar to the Seralini group’s. For example, in 2005, University of Pittsburg ecologists added Roundup at the manufacturer’s recommended dose to ponds filled with frog and toad tadpoles. When they returned two weeks later, they found that 50 to 100 percent of the populations of several species of tadpoles had been killed.

A group of over 250 environmental, health and labor organizations has petitioned the EPA to change requirements for identifying pesticides’ inert ingredients. The agency’s decision is due this fall.

“It would be a big step for the agency to take,” said Cox. “But it’s one they definitely should.”

The groups claim that the laws allowing manufacturers to keep inert ingredients secret from competitors are essentially unnecessary. Companies can determine a competitor’s inert ingredients through routine lab analyses, said Cox.

“The proprietary protection laws really only keep information from the public,” she said.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Virtual Server Hosting | Compare CD Rates Online, Bob Seger Tour and Registry Booster 2011