Why Skeptics Love to Hate Homeopathy

Why Skeptics Love to Hate Homeopathy
http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2009/12/09/Why-Skeptics-Love-to-Hate-Homeopathy.aspx

by Amy L. Lansky, PhD

www.impossiblecure.com

Perhaps the most derided of alternative medicines is my own favorite — homeopathy. Over the past few years, detractors have focused their efforts in the United Kingdom and have succeeded in crippling homeopathic hospitals and clinics funded by the National Health Service, as well as the practices of many homeopaths. A few well-placed editorials in prominent newspapers have done the trick, despite the fact that Prince Charles and the rest of the royal family are ardent supporters of homeopathy.

It now seems that some of these folks are taking their show on the road. Two key UK players, Michael Baum and Edzard Ernst have published a commentary in the November 2009 issue of the American Journal of Medicine [2] in which they state, “a belief in homeopathy exceeds the tolerance of an open mind. We should start from the premise that homeopathy cannot work and that positive evidence reflects publication bias or design flaws until proved otherwise.”

Not surprisingly, their commentary also reflects a complete ignorance of homeopathy and the range of studies that support its effectiveness. For example, their article incorrectly uses the term “potentation” instead of “potentization” for the method used to create homeopathic remedies (more on this later). The authors also insist on citing a single negative meta-analysis study that has already been shown to be methodologically flawed [3], while ignoring many positive studies in respected publications, including two other meta-analyses that showed positive results [4-9].

So why do the skeptics love to hate homeopathy? Perhaps because it is one of the most threatening alternative modalities — financially, philosophically, and therapeutically. Actually, homeopathy has been a threat to allopathy ever since the 1800s, when German physician Samuel Hahnemann developed the homeopathic system.

Founder of Homeopathy

Hahnemann, a respected doctor and chemist who helped to pioneer the importance of hygiene as well as homeopathy, was forced to move frequently during his life because the local German apothecaries objected to the fact that he created his own medicines rather than use theirs. A fierce battle was also waged against homeopathy in the United States during the 1800s, where homeopathy had achieved a strong presence by 1840. In fact, in 1847, the American Medical Association (AMA) was formed specifically to fight the battle against homeopathy.

Most homeopaths of the 1800s were former allopaths who had abandoned their brethren because they found Hahnemann’s system to be more successful in battling cholera, typhus, yellow fever, diptheria, influenza, and other epidemics of the 1800s. In retaliation, the preamble to the AMA’s charter forbade its members to associate with homeopaths or to use their medicines, and many doctors were expelled for failing to comply.

But does homeopathy really pose such a threat to conventional medicine today? To see how the little David of homeopathy could take down the Goliath of big pharma, we need to take a closer look at what homeopathy is all about.

Read more here: http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2009/12/09/Why-Skeptics-Love-to-Hate-Homeopathy.aspx

Dr. Klinghardt’s Treatment of Lyme Disease

Dr. Klinghardt’s Treatment of Lyme Disease
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/08/04/Dr-Klinghardts-Treatment-of-Lyme-Disease.aspx
Dr. Mercola
August 04 2009

Excerpted From the Writings of Dietrich Klinghardt, MD, Ph.D., edited by Eve Greenberg, LPC, CN, Explore Staff Reporter and Director of the Klinghardt Academy of Neurobiology

In the last decade the majority of outcome-oriented physicians observed a major shift: we realized that it was neither the lack of vitamins or growth hormone that made our patients ill. We discovered that toxicity and chronic infections were most often at the core of the client’s suffering.

We watched the discussion, which infection may be the primary one: mycoplasma, stealth viruses, HHV-6, trichomonas, Chlamydia pneumoniae, leptospirosis, mutated strep, or what else?

The new kid on the block is Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) and some of us have looked at it for a long time as possibly being the bug that opens the door for all the other infections to enter the system. Another one is Lyme disease, which has become a buzzword in the alternative medical field.

Since none of the recommended treatments are specific to either one of the microbes, we can never assume that we really know what we treated once a patient has recovered.

Microbiologist Gitte Jensen, PhD, had shown that the older you get, the more foreign DNA is attached to your own DNA. Somewhere along the line, pathogenic microbes invade the host’s DNA and become a permanent part of it. Since you use only 2 percent of your DNA, it may not be a problem. In fact, it may make you who you finally become. It may also cause a number of symptoms and chronic illness.

Genius Guenther Enderlein’s discoveries take us off the hook: if one microbe can change into another given the right environment, why bother to find out who we are infected with? The book “Lab 257” suggests that Bb is an escaped man-made US military bio-warfare organism (just like myoplasma incognitus and HHV 6).

Other authors suggest that different subtypes of Borrelia, which cause illness in humans, such as B. afzelii and B.garinii have probably existed longer than B.burgdorferi and occur naturally and have been with us for a long time, maybe centuries or much longer than that.

Continue Reading here:
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/08/04/Dr-Klinghardts-Treatment-of-Lyme-Disease.aspx

Double-Blind Study of Glutathione, Vitamin C and Cysteine in Children With Autism and Severe Behavior Problems

Double-Blind Study of Glutathione, Vitamin C and Cysteine in Children With Autism and Severe Behavior Problems
http://localclinicaltrials.com/NCT00889538/Double-Blind-Study-of-Glutathione,-Vitam.html?ref=twitter&q=Autism

Summary
This is a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of glutathione alone or glutathione, vitamin C and NAC treatment in children with autism who also have severe behavior problems.

Our hypothesis is that children with autism will show improvement in both learning capabilities and behavior with either glutathione, or glutathione, vitamin C and NAC therapy.
Condition / Disease
Autism
Severe Behavior Disorder

Therapy
placebo
glutathione
glutathione, vitamin C and N-acetylcysteine

Study Outcomes
Improvement in both developmental skills and behavior with either glutathione or glutathione, Vitamin C and N-acetylcysteine therapy as compared to placebo therapy. Subjects will also be monitored using clinical and laboratory safety parameters.
Response to glutathione (changes in behavior) will correlate with the glutathione level (GSH) and GSH:GSSG ratio

Description
This is a prospective, single center, double-blind, randomized pilot study in children and adolescents with autism and severe behavior disorders. All subjects will undergo initial screening procedures to determine eligibility. They will then be randomized to either 8 weeks of placebo or 8 weeks of glutathione or glutathione, vitamin C and N-acetylcysteine. They will receive intravenous treatment weekly and will have ongoing behavioral studies during this period. Following 8 weeks of therapy, they will have a week without treatment then will cross-over to the alternate therapy for weekly intravenous infusions and behavioral testing. In addition to baseline hematology and chemistries, baseline oxidized and reduced glutathione will be measured. These parameters will be repeated at the end of each 8 week course of therapy.

New study: amino acids could heal brain damage

New study: amino acids could heal brain damage
Friday, January 01, 2010 by: S. L. Baker, features writer
http://www.naturalnews.com/027849_amino_acids_brain_damage.html

(NaturalNews) A head-on car collision, a stumble that slams your head to the ground, a wound from a military battle in Afghanistan, a violent criminal assault — these and other causes of sudden blows to the head can result in traumatic brain injury (TBI). According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), TBI can be mild, moderate, or severe, depending on the extent of the damage to the brain. And symptoms can range from dizziness, headaches and memory problems to difficulty thinking, coma or even a vegetative state.

Unfortunately, there is no effective medical treatment for TBI. Although doctors can relieve the dangerous swelling that occurs after a traumatic brain injury, there is currently no way to reverse the underlying brain damage that can lead to cognitive losses in memory, learning and other functions. But neuroscientists think that could change, thanks to a natural treatment. A new study recently published in the online issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggests natural amino acids hold the key to healing brain injuries.

For the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded research, neuroscientists fed amino acids to brain-injured mice. The results? The animals’ cognitive abilities were restored. That, the researchers stated in a media release, may set the stage for the first effective treatment for cognitive impairments suffered by people with TBI. If these results from animal studies can be translated to human medicine, the impact will be huge, they added — because every 23 seconds, a man, woman or child in the United States suffers a TBI.

“We have shown in an animal model that dietary intervention can restore a proper balance of neurochemicals in the injured part of the brain, and simultaneously improves cognitive performance,” said study leader Akiva S. Cohen, Ph.D., a neuroscientist at The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, in a statement to the press.

For their study, the researchers used a mix of three branched chain amino acids (BCAAs), specifically leucine, isoleucine and valine. BCAAs are crucial to brain health because they are precursors of two neurotransmitters — glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid, or GABA. These neurotransmitters work together to balance brain activity. Specifically, glutamate excites neurons, stimulating them to fire, while GABA dampens down the firing of brain cells. A TBI can upset this balance and keep the brain from functioning normally.

Frequently, a TBI damages the structure deep in the brain involved in higher learning and memory known as the hippocampus. In their new study, the scientists discovered that an injury to the hippocampus reduces levels of BCAAs. That throws the critical balance of neurotransmitters in the hippocampus into disarray, causing some localized regions of the brain to be more excitable and others less excitable.

To test the idea that dietary BCAAs would restore the normal balance of neural responses to brain-injured animals, the scientists worked with mice that had been conditioned to fear a mild electric shock in their cage. The animals had developed a “freezing” response when placed in the cage because they anticipated a shock. Then the research team created brain injuries in one group of mice with this conditioned fear response and, a week later, compared this group to animals conditioned to the fear response that had no TBI. The injured mice had partially lost their memory of past shocks and so had fewer “freezing” responses.

However, when the brain-injured mice were given water to drink that contained BCAAs, the amino acid cocktail restored their learning ability and they regained the same normal responses as the uninjured animals. Moreover, additional experiments showed that BCAAs had restored the animals’ normal balance of neural activity.

Previous studies have revealed that people with brain injuries show mild functional improvements after receiving BCAAs through an intravenous line (IV). Dr. Cohen stated the new study suggests that BCAAs used as a dietary supplement could offer more sustained benefits than amino acids given through IVs. Early-phase clinical trials of dietary BCAAs in patients with mild to moderate traumatic brain injuries are expected to begin over the next year.

Editor’s note: NaturalNews is opposed to the use of animals in medical experiments that expose them to harm. We present these findings in protest of the way in which they were acquired.

For more information:
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/s…
http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/…
http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/tbi/TBI.htm

Vaccines: The Cause of Disease, More Proof

Vaccines: The Cause of Disease, More Proof
Posted on 03 January 2010 by C. Linderman Sr. – ATO Press
http://www.autismtodayonline.com/2010/autism/vaccines-the-cause-of-disease-more-proof/

In June of 2008, I participated in the Green Our Vaccines march on Washington D.C. The march had over 8,000 people attending and I still think fondly of the sight of tying up traffic in our nation’s capitol. We started the march at the Washington Monument and marched through the streets to the lawn of the Capitol building and as the head of the march was reaching the Capitol, 1.3 miles away, the rear of the line still had yet to begin marching through the streets, definitely a sight to behold. The tee shirts that most of us wore on the march stated “Green Our Vaccines” on the front of the shirt and on the back of the shirt was the mantra “Too Many Too Soon”.

While many doctors and researchers in the mainstream medical community continue to state that while there are indeed more vaccines on the mandated schedule in America, they claim that there are far fewer antigens (the actual viruses)in the vaccines, thereby making them far more safe than those of the past decades. This is disingenuous to say the least. While fewer antigens are in the vaccines now, we have never before vaccinated children with so many different antigens at one time. A mere cursory glance at the mandated CDC recommended vaccine schedule is enough to frighten most parents and concerned medical practitioners.

A recent study out of Japan once again brings these concerns that many of us in the natural health community have, to light. The study/research article entitled: Self-Organized Criticality Theory of Autoimmunity, was authored by Ken Tsumiyama, Yumi Miyazaki and Shunichi Shiozawa from the Department of Biophysics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine and was published on December 31st 2009. http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0008382?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:%20plosone/PLoSONE%20(PLoS%20ONE%20Alerts:%20New%20Articles)%20

This paper’s conclusion really says it all: “Systemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the host’s immune ‘system’ by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system’s self-organized criticality.” The methodology of the study was repeated immunization of mice otherwise not prone to spontaneous auto immune diseases. What they found was T cell damage due to the immunizations.

When we consider the onslaught of autoimmune diseases now permeating our society and destroying our children, we must consider the evidence that clearly shows that these diseases seem to rise in direct correlation with the added number of vaccines on the CDC’s recommended schedule. Another study that also seems to corroborate the findings from the Kobe University study is the Manitoba Canada study showing that by simply delaying the DtP vaccine by mere months reduced the diagnosis of asthma by more than 50%. Keep in mind, asthma is an auto immune disease and kills more than 6000 Americans a year. http://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(07)02379-2/abstract

There is no doubt in my mind that this is happening. The question of the century would then have to be: with all of the evidence pointing to vaccines as the culprit in the onslaught of autoimmune diseases in this country and abroad, why in the world is this still going on?

At the expense of sounding like a complete conspiracy nut, there really is only one explanation: PROFIT.

There is no doubt that governments throughout the world are at best, ‘influenced’ by the pharmaceutical lobbies that bring cash and power into the equation, and at worst, are in fact enslaved by the pharmaceutical cash cow. We have witnessed the Dr. Andrew Wakefield debacle going on in England through the General medical Council fitness to practice hearing. This hearing has been influenced by the pharmaceutical companies and is indicative of how all of our mainstream medical organizations are enslaved by the pharmaceutical industry.

The driving force behind this particular hearing has been The Sunday Times of London and a “free-lance” reporter named Brian Deer. While one would hope that journalists and newspapers would act responsibly, especially with such an important topic as vaccines, this is unfortunately not the case here. I find it hard to believe that the fact that James Murdoch, The Sunday Time’s editor, also happens to sit on the board of Glaxxo Smith Kline, the maker of the MMR vaccine in Europe, is not a point of interest to the media.

This unfortunately happens all too frequently and it must stop. There is little doubt that the growing number of auto immune diseases across the planet has become a veritable gold mine for the drug manufacturers, selling their poisonous and expensive drugs to those already affected previously by their poisons. The fact that all of our media is dependent upon advertising revenue from these very same companies can no longer go ignored. We are not only fighting a ravenous drug cartel that would make a Columbian cocaine kingpin look like a typical street pusher, we are also fighting a medical establishment and media that are bound by their masters to ensure that this information never becomes mainstreamed.

When brave researchers like those in Japan, Canada and England step up to the plate and attempt to tell the truth about the onslaught of diseases caused by these government mandated vaccines, it is our job to ensure that the information gets to the parents that so desperately need it. To do otherwise would be a crime and criminals seem to be prolific on the other side of the controversy.

The true criminals are not those impoverished young men and women sitting in our prisons for selling a dime bag on the street. The true criminals sit in our capitol buildings, Congress, the Senate and parliaments across the world. The true criminals are the editors, producers and journalists that sell their souls for advertising dollars and Euros at the expense of our children. The true criminals are the pharmaceutical companies that poison our citizenry for profit. It’s time we put a stop to this.

Children reaching age 3 without being able to say a word, survey finds

Perhaps we should stop pumping our children full of garbage in the name of medical advancement when all it means is more profit for Big Pharma and a generation of children who cannot function properly. The FDA, CDC & AAP could care less other than getting your kids their vaccines. Wake up, America – your kids/grandkids are next.

Children reaching age 3 without being able to say a word, survey finds
Joanna Sugden
January 4, 2010

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/education/article6974590.ece

Children are reaching the age of 3 without being able to say a word, according to a survey that also found boys are almost twice as likely to struggle to learn to speak as girls.

The average age for a baby to speak their first word is 10 to 11 months. However, a significant minority (4 per cent) of parents reported that their child said nothing until they were 3.

Toddlers between the ages of 2 and 3 should be able to use up to 300 words, including adjectives, and be able to link words together, according to I CAN, the children’s communication charity. Late speech development can lead to problems, such as low achievement at school or mental health problems.

The survey of more than 1,000 parents found that a child’s background was not a factor in how quickly they learnt to talk. Working parents who put their babies in day care are just as likely to have a child whose speech develops late as those who leave their baby in front of the television.

Related Links
Communication is a vital skill for children
Young children lack basic language skills
Primary schools hire bankers to teach maths
Virginia Beardshaw, the chief executive of I CAN, said that learning to talk required help and encouragement. “We know there is a golden period for developing children’s communication between 0 and 5 and that early intervention is vital if children are struggling,” she said. “Chatting to your child, playing word games, pointing things out and having fun together every day all give your child the right start to communication.”

Parents should interact as much as possible, reading stories and talking to their children to encourage them to start talking, speech therapists advise. They say that dummies should only be resorted to at bedtime so children are free to make sounds and form words during the day.

More girls than boys (34 per cent against 27 per cent) said their first word before they reached nine months, the YouGov poll of 1,015 parents of children aged 1 to 7 found.

Almost one in six parents reported that their child had problems learning to talk. Among parents of boys the figure rose to one in four.

The vast majority (95 per cent) of parents remembered their child’s first word. The most common was “Dadda” (15 per cent), with 10 per cent saying “Mama” first. Besides parental names the top word was “cat”, followed by “car” and “no”. Some more unusual choices were “beer”, “gadget”, “hoover” and even “tits-up”.

Girls were quicker to join words together, with more than 20 per cent having done so by the age of 1, compared to 16 per cent of boys. Almost one quarter of those who had problems learning to talk did not receive any help from a speech and language therapist, nursery or playgroup staff.

Jean Gross, the Government’s new adviser on childhood language development, said that it was a real problem that children as old as 3 were unable to talk. “It has lifelong effects for children in terms of their ability to learn to read and write,” she said.

Ms Gross said childhood health targets were too focused on obesity levels and immunisation rates at the expense of more subtle difficulties.

All of those surveyed last month reported looking at picture books with their child, telling stories, playing word games and singing nursery rhymes, with boys and girls enjoying these activities equally and at a similar age.

However, children from more affluent families were said to enjoy doing so at a younger age than children from less affluent families.

Eighty per cent of parents knew that the correct response if their child mispronounced a word was to repeat it back to them in the correct way.

Case study: ‘He’s now chatty and sociable’

Lee Rose reached the age of 3 able to say only five words. His parents were not worried. “I had no other children to compare him with and his father was a late talker,” said Emma Rose, from Plymouth.

Doctors and health visitors did not pick up the problem. It was not until Lee’s nursery teachers noticed that he lashed out at another child in frustration that concerns were raised. After an assessment he was referred to an I CAN centre — a mainstream nursery school with a specialist speech and language department and a support group for parents.

Lee spent 12 months at the centre. “It was the one-to-one help that he needed and early intervention,” said Mrs Rose. Now 8, he is in the top group for all his lessons at primary school. “They have turned my little boy’s life around. He is chatty, sociable and has lots of friends.” Mrs Rose, 39, a former hospital technician, is retraining as a speech and language assistant.

Gluten: What You Don’t Know Might Kill You

Gluten: What You Don’t Know Might Kill You
Mark Hyman, M.D.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-mark-hyman/gluten-what-you-dont-know_b_379089.html

Something you’re eating may be killing you, and you probably don’t even know it!

If you eat cheeseburgers or French fries all the time or drink six sodas a day, you likely know you are shortening your life. But eating a nice dark, crunchy slice of whole wheat bread–how could that be bad for you?

Well, bread contains gluten, a protein found in wheat, barley, rye, spelt, kamut, and oats. It is hidden in pizza, pasta, bread, wraps, rolls, and most processed foods. Clearly, gluten is a staple of the American diet.

What most people don’t know is that gluten can cause serious health complications for many. You may be at risk even if you don’t have full blown celiac disease.

In today’s blog I want to reveal the truth about gluten, explain the dangers, and provide you with a simple system that will help you determine whether or not gluten is a problem for you.

The Dangers of Gluten

A recent large study in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that people with diagnosed, undiagnosed, and “latent” celiac disease or gluten sensitivity had a higher risk of death, mostly from heart disease and cancer. (i)

Keep reading here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-mark-hyman/gluten-what-you-dont-know_b_379089.html

Round 63 Complete

Keeping count

Julie Gerberding Named Head of Merck Vaccines

AdventuresInAutism.blogspot.com hits this one out of the park. Thank you, Ginger, once again for a brilliant blog post!

Julie Gerberding Named Head of Merck Vaccines
http://adventuresinautism.blogspot.com/2009/12/julie-gerberding-named-head-of-merck.html

Wow… Congratulations Julie! Who would have guessed that you would be the one person in the whole world that Merck would want to head their vaccine division?

Oh… that is right… we did.

Julie’s years of “looking and looking” for a vaccine/autism connection with the firm resolve of OJ Simpson looking for the real killers, asinine statements on autism in the press and denialism of an epidemic happening in front of everyone’s eyes has finally paid off big for her.

Here is what we do know now… that the head of vaccines for Merck is a liar. And one who tells absurd lies and thinks that people will swallow them. In the age of vaccine skepticism, Merck was so concerned with winning the public trust that they hired the woman who was the at the helm of the autism epidemic for the last eight years.

Brilliant.

But I am guessing that deal with the devil was made long ago.

There is no one whose actions I have had more contempt for in this health disaster than Julie Gerberding. My son regressed into autism following his vaccines on her watch. I became increasingly incensed by her actions, non-actions and thinly veiled vaccine salesmanship as the years rolled on; but I don’t think down deep that even I actually believed that out of all the positions in the world she would take THE job with THE company that would truly prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that she was working for PHARMA at the expense of our kids since Bush appointed her as CDC head. If for no other reason out of embarrassment for what it would betray about her.

The woman has no shame.

The position is announced Christmas week, I guess hoping that mom’s like me will be too busy trying to keep their kids with autism from eating the glass balls off the yule tree to notice. And it may be that she was legally prevented from taking the job any sooner. Email from someone who travels in these circles:

“…but based on a conversation I recently had with a friend who is a former Bush Administration official, this is pretty close to the minimum interval for how former feds can go to work with a company they regulated after leaving government. January 25th: a year and three business days after Obama’s inauguration (January 20th, 2009). January 25th 2010 is the first Monday she could start”.

So as Julie ascends to this esteemed position, lets take a walk down memory lane of her disastrous reign as the chief of our nations public health services at all the bull shit she has had to offer us.

First, a critical review of the only thimerosal/autism study done under Julie’s tenure:

Keep reading here:
http://adventuresinautism.blogspot.com/2009/12/julie-gerberding-named-head-of-merck.html
You’re going to want to know all about her if you don’t already.

Round 62: Complete

We took a 2 week break and are back to chelating.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Virtual Server Hosting | Compare CD Rates Online, Bob Seger Tour and Registry Booster 2011